Humayun Sarfraz

Project Owner

test entry

Project for Round 4
Funding Awarded $1,000 USD
Funding Pools Ideation-phase
Milestones 0 / 1 Completed

Status

Overall Status
⏳ Contract Pending
Funding Transfered
$0_USD
Max Funding Amount
$1,000_USD

Funding Schedule

View Milestones

Milestone Release 1

$1,000 USD

Pending

TBD

Overview

adsas

Proposal Description

Our Team

sadas

The core problem we are aiming to solve

xzasf

Our specific solution to this problem

Project details

Links and references

Additional videos

Activity Summary

Milestones

1

Total

Discussion

4

Total Comments

Reviews

0

Total Posted

Project Team

3

Total People

Reviews & Rating

New reviews and ratings are disabled for Awarded Projects

Overall Community

0

from 0 reviews

5

0
4

0
3

0
2

0
1

0

Feasibility

0

from 0 reviews

Viability

0

from 0 reviews

Desirabilty

0

from 0 reviews

Usefulness

0

from 0 reviews

Sort by

0 ratings

No Reviews Avaliable

Check back later by refreshing the page.

Posting publicaly as

edit profile

Overall

Confidence level that the project is possible at all Feasibility

0
Confidence in a successful outcome considering team, time, and budget Viability

0
Market fit - Balancing needs and benefits against competition Desirabilty

0
To what extent will the project help the AI platform grow? Usefulness

0

Review Headline

0 /50 chars

Review Summary

0 /5000 chars

Expert Review

Overall

Confidence level that the project is possible at all Feasibility

0
Confidence in a successful outcome considering team, time, and budget Viability

0
Market fit - Balancing needs and benefits against competition Desirabilty

0
To what extent will the project help the AI platform grow? Usefulness

0

Review Headline

0 /50 chars

Review Summary

0 /5000 chars

Reviews and Ratings in Deep Funding are structured in 4 categories. This will ensure that the reviewer takes all these perspectives into account in their assessment and it will make it easier to compare different projects on their strengths and weaknesses. Overall (Primary) This is an average of the 4 perspectives. At the start of this new process, we are assigning an equal weight to all categories, but over time we might change this and make some categories more important than others in the overall score. (This may even be done retroactively). Feasibility (secondary) This represents the user's assessment of whether the proposed project is theoretically possible and if it is deemed feasible. E.g. A proposal for nuclear fission might be theoretically possible, but it doesn’t look very feasible in the context of Deep Funding. Viability (secondary) This category is somewhat similar to Feasibility, but it interprets the feasibility against factors such as the size and experience of the team, the budget requested, and the estimated timelines. We could frame this as: “What is your level of confidence that this team will be able to complete this project and its milestones in a reasonable time, and successfully deploy it?” Examples:

A proposal that promises the development of a personal assistant that outperforms existing solutions might be feasible, but if there is no AI expertise in the team the viability rating might be low.
A proposal that promises a new Carbon Emission Compensation scheme might be technically feasible, but the viability could be estimated low due to challenges around market penetration and widespread adoption.

Desirability (secondary) Even if the project team succeeds in creating a product, there is the question of market fit. Is this a project that fulfills an actual need? Is there a lot of competition already? Are the USPs of the project sufficient to make a difference? Example:

Creating a translation service from, say Spanish to English might be possible, but it's questionable if such a service would be able to get a significant share of the market

Usefulness (secondary) This is a crucial category that aligns with the main goal of the Deep Funding program. The question to be asked here is: “To what extent will this proposal help to grow the Decentralized AI Platform?” For proposals that develop or utilize an AI service on the platform, the question could be “How many API calls do we expect it to generate” (and how important / high-valued are these calls?). For a marketing proposal, the question could be “How large and well-aligned is the target audience?” Another question is related to how the budget is spent. Are the funds mainly used for value creation for the platform or on other things? Examples:

A metaverse project that spends 95% of its budget on the development of the game and only 5 % on the development of an AI service for the platform might expect a low ‘usefulness’ rating here.

A marketing proposal that creates t-shirts for a local high school, would get a lower ‘usefulness’ rating than a marketing proposal that has a viable plan for targeting highly esteemed universities in a scaleable way.
An AI service that is fully dedicated to a single product, does not take advantage of the purpose of the platform. When the same service would be offered and useful for other parties, this should increase the ‘usefulness’ rating.

Reviews and Ratings in Deep Funding are structured in 4 categories. This will ensure that the reviewer takes all these perspectives into account in their assessment and it will make it easier to compare different projects on their strengths and weaknesses. Overall (Primary) This is an average of the 4 perspectives. At the start of this new process, we are assigning an equal weight to all categories, but over time we might change this and make some categories more important than others in the overall score. (This may even be done retroactively). Feasibility (secondary) This represents the user\'s assessment of whether the proposed project is theoretically possible and if it is deemed feasible. E.g. A proposal for nuclear fission might be theoretically possible, but it doesn’t look very feasible in the context of Deep Funding. Viability (secondary) This category is somewhat similar to Feasibility, but it interprets the feasibility against factors such as the size and experience of the team, the budget requested, and the estimated timelines. We could frame this as: “What is your level of confidence that this team will be able to complete this project and its milestones in a reasonable time, and successfully deploy it?” Examples:

A proposal that promises the development of a personal assistant that outperforms existing solutions might be feasible, but if there is no AI expertise in the team the viability rating might be low.
A proposal that promises a new Carbon Emission Compensation scheme might be technically feasible, but the viability could be estimated low due to challenges around market penetration and widespread adoption.

Creating a translation service from, say Spanish to English might be possible, but it\'s questionable if such a service would be able to get a significant share of the market

A metaverse project that spends 95% of its budget on the development of the game and only 5 % on the development of an AI service for the platform might expect a low ‘usefulness’ rating here.

A marketing proposal that creates t-shirts for a local high school, would get a lower ‘usefulness’ rating than a marketing proposal that has a viable plan for targeting highly esteemed universities in a scaleable way.
An AI service that is fully dedicated to a single product, does not take advantage of the purpose of the platform. When the same service would be offered and useful for other parties, this should increase the ‘usefulness’ rating.

Total Milestones
1
Total Budget
$1,000_USD
Last Updated
13 Nov 2024

Milestone 1 - 1

Status

😐 Not Started

Description

Deliverables

Budget

$1,000 USD

Link URL

Join the Discussion (4)

Sort by

4 Comments

0

caboye8076
Apr 24, 2025 | 4:49 AM

testtttt
0

Humayun S
Project Owner Jun 25, 2024 | 6:37 AM

wqqew
0

Humayun S
Project Owner Jun 14, 2024 | 5:03 AM

add another comment
0

Humayun S
Project Owner Jun 5, 2024 | 6:13 AM

Edit Comment

Here is my reply in clearer terms to questions during Pitch Spotlight for a practical example of our project's use case: <a href="https://deepfunding.ai/proposal/4675/" rel="nofollow ugc">https://deepfunding.ai/proposal/4675/</a> Facts Autistic individuals have high unemployment (~84%) and mortality (39-54 yrs) mostly due to barriers to employment, accommodations, and the personal stress of "masking" or hiding neurodivergent traits to try and blend in. This leads, in financial terms, to high lost productivity, income and higher medical costs of 0.5 to 3 million dollars USD per person, worldwide. Research links: <a href="https://docs.google.com/document/d/1VLh0Pq0nUeU3Su9bymEJ17IpTgM8YFsZzpX047o2qOo/edit#heading=h.b4grant72lcy" rel="nofollow ugc">https://docs.google.com/document/d/1VLh0Pq0nUeU3Su9bymEJ17IpTgM8YFsZzpX047o2qOo/edit#heading=h.b4grant72lcy</a> Our Proposal's Pillars - employment, side income, and a place at the table of future AGIGiven the magnitude of this inequality at odds with the education, skills and talent neurodivergent (ND) people actually have, I've designated employment opportunity and outreach as the two most important factors to focus on. ND traits are mostly understood only through a very small portion of the community, and it is a worldwide, human, phenomenon. So, our solution needs to work with a wide variety of individualized traits, worldwide - a perfect problem to develop in context with AI and AGI. We've already been developing outreach over the past year thanks to our team who have the connections.Practical Use CaseA practical example is an individual connects with the League through outreach, our social media, or in concert with existing ND services that have pre-vetted the neurodiverse situation of their client. The new League member signs on and works with us to develop their private profile of skills, accommodations needs, traits, and how they'd like to present themselves in the style of the League.Our then-existing AI service works to match their traits, skills and needs to employers worldwide registered with us, or with existing employment services we work with VIA outreach. We can present our new League member directly to employers, or the ND applicant can do so themselves. AGIX, SingularityNET and Virtual Economies Play a Vital RoleI've found that knowledge of AI and cryptocurrency, which has given me an opportunity, is not so well known in my support groups. So, I've added on-boarding to SNET to our proposal to help grow our SNET community with the ND community. A trial (test) of a virtual economy is an important pillar to include because many of us work from home, which gives us control over our environment, but also can limit our new opportunities. Also, existing markets and service plaforms have too many teams or bad actors disrupting others' income, so a new service dedicated to our needs is valuable.Our Place in the Future of AI: AGILastly, given that ND individuals worldwide are essentially kept out of mainstream income, promotion, online and IRL prosperity opportunities, I think it important to make a place for us in the near future of AGI, and to leaven AGI's characteristics with our brilliantly neurodiverse minds. So to that end we will start figuring out AGI development using the OpenCog framework, to make a platform with a worldview for neurodiverse minds (1 in 5 people worldwide, 1 in 100 are autistic). Thank you! If I can accomplish all of this, I know ND people worldwide can too with the League of Extraordinary Talent and the fully skilled team we now are. Pitch SpotlightPitch video (a wonderful chance for me to design a narrative and edit again, elevated to a higher standard by our team's voiceover and critiques): <a title="https://youtu.be/nsv1Ogbp-VM?si=CKvNLSghL1da25mj" href="https://youtu.be/nsv1Ogbp-VM?si=CKvNLSghL1da25mj" rel="nofollow ugc">https://youtu.be/nsv1Ogbp-VM?si=CKvNLSghL1da25mj</a>

Here is my reply in clearer terms to questions during Pitch Spotlight for a practical example of our project's use case: https://deepfunding.ai/proposal/4675/

Facts Autistic individuals have high unemployment (~84%) and mortality (39-54 yrs) mostly due to barriers to employment, accommodations, and the personal stress of "masking" or hiding neurodivergent traits to try and blend in. This leads, in financial terms, to high lost productivity, income and higher medical costs of 0.5 to 3 million dollars USD per person, worldwide. Research links: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1VLh0Pq0nUeU3Su9bymEJ17IpTgM8YFsZzpX047o2qOo/edit#heading=h.b4grant72lcy Our Proposal's Pillars - employment, side income, and a place at the table of future AGIGiven the magnitude of this inequality at odds with the education, skills and talent neurodivergent (ND) people actually have, I've designated employment opportunity and outreach as the two most important factors to focus on. ND traits are mostly understood only through a very small portion of the community, and it is a worldwide, human, phenomenon. So, our solution needs to work with a wide variety of individualized traits, worldwide - a perfect problem to develop in context with AI and AGI. We've already been developing outreach over the past year thanks to our team who have the connections.Practical Use CaseA practical example is an individual connects with the League through outreach, our social media, or in concert with existing ND services that have pre-vetted the neurodiverse situation of their client. The new League member signs on and works with us to develop their private profile of skills, accommodations needs, traits, and how they'd like to present themselves in the style of the League.Our then-existing AI service works to match their traits, skills and needs to employers worldwide registered with us, or with existing employment services we work with VIA outreach. We can present our new League member directly to employers, or the ND applicant can do so themselves. AGIX, SingularityNET and Virtual Economies Play a Vital RoleI've found that knowledge of AI and cryptocurrency, which has given me an opportunity, is not so well known in my support groups. So, I've added on-boarding to SNET to our proposal to help grow our SNET community with the ND community. A trial (test) of a virtual economy is an important pillar to include because many of us work from home, which gives us control over our environment, but also can limit our new opportunities. Also, existing markets and service plaforms have too many teams or bad actors disrupting others' income, so a new service dedicated to our needs is valuable.Our Place in the Future of AI: AGILastly, given that ND individuals worldwide are essentially kept out of mainstream income, promotion, online and IRL prosperity opportunities, I think it important to make a place for us in the near future of AGI, and to leaven AGI's characteristics with our brilliantly neurodiverse minds. So to that end we will start figuring out AGI development using the OpenCog framework, to make a platform with a worldview for neurodiverse minds (1 in 5 people worldwide, 1 in 100 are autistic). Thank you! If I can accomplish all of this, I know ND people worldwide can too with the League of Extraordinary Talent and the fully skilled team we now are. Pitch SpotlightPitch video (a wonderful chance for me to design a narrative and edit again, elevated to a higher standard by our team's voiceover and critiques): https://youtu.be/nsv1Ogbp-VM?si=CKvNLSghL1da25mj

Expert Ratings

Reviews & Ratings

New reviews and ratings are disabled for Awarded Projects

No Reviews Avaliable

Check back later by refreshing the page.

The weighted average of the 4 perspectives Overall

0.0
To what extent will the project help the AI platform grow?Usefulness

0.0
Confidence level that the project is possible at allFeasibility

0.0
Market fit - Balancing needs and benefits against competitionDesirabilty

0.0

Review Headline

0 /50 chars

Review Summary

0 /5000 chars

The weighted average of the 4 perspectives Overall

0.0
To what extent will the project help the AI platform grow?Usefulness

0.0
Confidence level that the project is possible at allFeasibility

0.0
Market fit - Balancing needs and benefits against competitionDesirabilty

0.0

Review Headline

0 /50 chars

0 /5000 chars

Warning: Adding final group rating for this project will prevent expert users from adding new or editing existing reviews

A proposal that promises the development of a personal assistant that outperforms existing solutions might be feasible, but if there is no AI expertise in the team the viability rating might be low.
A proposal that promises a new Carbon Emission Compensation scheme might be technically feasible, but the viability could be estimated low due to challenges around market penetration and widespread adoption.

Creating a translation service from, say Spanish to English might be possible, but it's questionable if such a service would be able to get a significant share of the market

A metaverse project that spends 95% of its budget on the development of the game and only 5 % on the development of an AI service for the platform might expect a low ‘usefulness’ rating here.

A marketing proposal that creates t-shirts for a local high school, would get a lower ‘usefulness’ rating than a marketing proposal that has a viable plan for targeting highly esteemed universities in a scaleable way.
An AI service that is fully dedicated to a single product, does not take advantage of the purpose of the platform. When the same service would be offered and useful for other parties, this should increase the ‘usefulness’ rating.

Reviews and Ratings in Deep Funding are structured in 4 categories. This will ensure that the reviewer takes all these perspectives into account in their assessment and it will make it easier to compare different projects on their strengths and weaknesses. Overall (Primary) This is an average of the 4 perspectives. At the start of this new process, we are assigning an equal weight to all categories, but over time we might change this and make some categories more important than others in the overall score. (This may even be done retroactively). Feasibility (secondary) This represents the user\'s assessment of whether the proposed project is theoretically possible and if it is deemed feasible. E.g. A proposal for nuclear fission might be theoretically possible, but it doesn’t look very feasible in the context of Deep Funding. Viability (secondary) This category is somewhat similar to Feasibility, but it interprets the feasibility against factors such as the size and experience of the team, the budget requested, and the estimated timelines. We could frame this as: “What is your level of confidence that this team will be able to complete this project and its milestones in a reasonable time, and successfully deploy it?” Examples:

A proposal that promises the development of a personal assistant that outperforms existing solutions might be feasible, but if there is no AI expertise in the team the viability rating might be low.
A proposal that promises a new Carbon Emission Compensation scheme might be technically feasible, but the viability could be estimated low due to challenges around market penetration and widespread adoption.

Creating a translation service from, say Spanish to English might be possible, but it\'s questionable if such a service would be able to get a significant share of the market

A metaverse project that spends 95% of its budget on the development of the game and only 5 % on the development of an AI service for the platform might expect a low ‘usefulness’ rating here.

A marketing proposal that creates t-shirts for a local high school, would get a lower ‘usefulness’ rating than a marketing proposal that has a viable plan for targeting highly esteemed universities in a scaleable way.
An AI service that is fully dedicated to a single product, does not take advantage of the purpose of the platform. When the same service would be offered and useful for other parties, this should increase the ‘usefulness’ rating.

Humayun S

Project Owner

www

View Profile

Account Pending

rtyyyyyy

qwewqqw

test entry

Humayun Sarfraz

test entry

Status

⏳ Contract Pending

$0 USD

$1,000 USD

Funding Schedule

Milestone Release 1

Project AI Services

Overview

Proposal Description

Our Team

The core problem we are aiming to solve

Our specific solution to this problem

Project details

Links and references

Additional videos

Activity Summary

Milestones

1

Discussion

4

Reviews

0

Project Team

3

Proposal Video

Reviews & Rating

Overall Community

0

Feasibility

0

Viability

0

Desirabilty

0

Usefulness

0

Sort by

No Reviews Avaliable

1

$1,000 USD

13 Nov 2024

Milestone 1 - 1

Status

Description

Deliverables

Budget

Link URL

Join the Discussion (4)

Sort by

caboye8076

Humayun S

Humayun S

Humayun S

Expert Ratings

No Reviews Avaliable

Humayun S

Account Pending

Account Pending

Receive notifications on Deep Funding

Subscribe To NewsLetter

Product

Program

Resources

SingularityNET

Welcome to our website!

$0_USD

$1,000_USD

$1,000_USD